|
A century ago, in ''Johannesburg Consolidated Investment Co v Johannesburg Town Council'', Innes CJ distinguished only three types of judicial review in the South African system: # review of the decisions of inferior courts; # the common-law review of decisions of administrative authorities; and # a "wider" form of statutory review. These three forms of review still exist today, but the list has been expanded as a result of modern developments, including and most especially the Constitution. Among the latest additions are * automatic review, which allows the decisions of inferior courts to be reconsidered in the absence of an application for review; * constitutional review, a form of review that did not exist in South Africa before 1994, but which the existence of a supreme constitution with a justiciable Bill of Rights permits; and * what used to be common-law review in administrative law but has now largely been constitutionalised by section 33 of the Constitution and placed on a statutory footing by the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA). == Forms of judicial review == 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Judicial review in South Africa」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|